Skip to content

docs: use correct PDF reference link in stats/base/dists/signrank/pdf#10303

Merged
Planeshifter merged 1 commit intostdlib-js:developfrom
shubham220420:shubham2204-link
Feb 15, 2026
Merged

docs: use correct PDF reference link in stats/base/dists/signrank/pdf#10303
Planeshifter merged 1 commit intostdlib-js:developfrom
shubham220420:shubham2204-link

Conversation

@shubham220420
Copy link
Contributor


type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

  • task: lint_filenames status: passed
  • task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
  • task: lint_markdown status: passed
  • task: lint_package_json status: na
  • task: lint_repl_help status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_src status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_examples status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_tests status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: na
  • task: lint_python status: na
  • task: lint_r status: na
  • task: lint_c_src status: na
  • task: lint_c_examples status: na
  • task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
  • task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
  • task: lint_shell status: na
  • task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
  • task: lint_typescript_tests status: na
  • task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Resolves None

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • This PR add correct PDF reference link in stats/base/dists/signrank/pdf, below is the link that was used to refer PDF
  • Incorrect Link used in signrank/pdf

Screenshot 2026-02-15 at 6 18 21 PM

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

  • None related

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

  • Yes
  • No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

  • Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
  • Test/benchmark generation
  • Documentation (including examples)
  • Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

{{TODO: add disclosure if applicable}}


@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Feb 15, 2026
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
stats/base/dists/signrank/pdf $\color{red}358/360$
$\color{green}+99.44%$
$\color{red}36/37$
$\color{green}+97.30%$
$\color{green}5/5$
$\color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{red}358/360$
$\color{green}+99.44%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@Planeshifter Planeshifter changed the title fix: add correct PDF reference link in stats/base/dists/signrank/pdf docs: use correct PDF reference link in stats/base/dists/signrank/pdf Feb 15, 2026
@Planeshifter Planeshifter added the Ready To Merge A pull request which is ready to be merged. label Feb 15, 2026
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Feb 15, 2026
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

PR Commit Message

docs: use correct PDF reference link in `stats/base/dists/signrank/pdf`

PR-URL: https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/pull/10303

Reviewed-by: Philipp Burckhardt <pburckhardt@outlook.com>

Please review the above commit message and make any necessary adjustments.

@Planeshifter Planeshifter merged commit 5360fda into stdlib-js:develop Feb 15, 2026
71 checks passed
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the Ready To Merge A pull request which is ready to be merged. label Feb 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants